 |
|
ScienceofSpeed FAQs > NSX > ENPP > Stroker
Engines |
|
|
Q: What is a stroker engine? |
|
A: The term stroker engine typically refers
to an engine that has had an increase over factory of the throw or stroke of the
engine's piston. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What are the benefits of a stroked engine? |
|
A: Increasing of the stroke can result in
increased torque especially noticed in the lower rev range by increasing the
length of time that the force of the combustion is transmitted through the
engine to the wheels. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What is the limiting factor of stroke? |
|
A: A few of the limiting factors include: |
- increased piston speed may affect
reliability due to opposing forces placed on components
- increased side loading from rod angle may
affect piston and cylinder sleeve reliability
- increase piston dwell time can affect high
engine speed torque
|
|
|
|
Q: How does ScienceofSpeed build stroked
engines? |
A: A billet crankshaft is manufactured
specifically for the NSX that replaces the factory crankshaft to offer an
increased stroke over factory. It is important to realize that the crankshafts
that are used are custom made from billet stock, heat treated, and precision
ground to exacting specifications. The crankshafts are not reground factory
crankshafts with smaller rod journals like offered by other NSX tuners from
Japan. The billet made crankshafts are exceedingly high quality used in
applications producing more than 200 hp / cylinder and offer an excellent
alternative where low volume makes forging unfeasible.
In addition to increasing the stroke of the engine we also increase the bore in
most applications allowing greater surface area for the combustion force to act
on.
Custom built forged pistons allow the factory forged titanium connecting rods to
be used for naturally aspirated built engines while billet rods are available
for forced induction applications.
The materials used, tolerances, and balancing most often exceeds Honda's high
standards where the factory's production costs are an element as with any
production vehicle. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What are the specifications of the
ScienceofSpeed stroked engines? |
|
A: Due to using parts custom to these
engines, we can produce an engine in a variety of displacements from 3.0L -
3.8L. The factory 3.0L has a 90mm bore x 78mm stroke. The factory 3.2L has a
93mm x 78mm stroke. We can vary the bore by 90-95mm and stroke from 78-88mm. Our
most popular naturally aspirated engine sizes are 3.8L (95mm x 88mm) for street
use and 3.6L (93mm x 88mm) for road course use. Our most popular engine size for
forced induction is 3.5L (93mm x 76mm). In addition, the heads, cams, and other
components are reworked specific to the application. |
|
|
|
Q: Is forced induction (super/turbocharged) or
natural aspiration better? |
A: The customer's use and application
determines which method for power gain is most suitable. Both methods have
advantages and disadvantages and it's too complicated of an issue to say which
is better as a general blanket statement. ScienceofSpeed supports and builds
solutions for both forced induction and natural aspirated applications.
Natural aspiration is limited by the pressure of the intake charge being at
atmospheric pressure. This pressure is introduced into the combustion chamber
and squeezed under compression to produce an opposing force under combustion
that acts upon the engine's rotating assembly to transmit power to the wheels.
Forced induction allows an artificial method of increasing the pressure of this
intake charge to maximize mixture density. The higher charge density can in turn
place more force on the rotating assembly to transmit more power to the wheels.
Naturally aspirated engines are most often credited for better free revving and
tip in throttle response. Forced induction engines rely on a compressor to
supply the pressurized charge by engine belt rotation (supercharged) or exhaust
pressure. Many road race drivers prefer this throttle response during cornering
where the throttle is being modulated rapidly and a linear throttle response
eases chassis control.
However, when considering significant power gains (such as more than 20% for the
NSX), forced induction can be a much more cost effective solution. In addition,
forced induction is capable of producing gains that are physically impossible
(especially on standard pump fuel available to most consumers) with naturally
aspirated engines.
In scope of the NSX, stroked engines are certainly capable of producing as much
if not more power comparable forced induction systems.
example: 3.2L Comptech Supercharger vs.
ScienceofSpeed 3.6L
36L-vs-CTSC32L.pdf
3.2L Comptech Supercharger = pink
ScienceofSpeed 3.6L stroker engine = red
However, the referenced stroker engine nears
the limit of natural aspiration power for the NSX limited by standard pump gas
and currently available induction and exhaust components. Forced induction
setups can easily meet and surpass these gains.
example: turbocharged system @ 12 psi vs.
ScienceofSpeed 3.6L
36L-vs-turbo12psi.pdf
turbocharged system @ 12psi = blue
ScienceofSpeed 3.6L stroker engine = red
This discussion could be endless touching on the
variety of factors that may or may not be important or relevant to your
circumstance (race sanctioning body restrictions, the desire to keep the
original method of induction in place, etc) and it's a decision that for most
customers comes down to personal preference. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What is more reliable? Natural aspiration or
forced induction? |
A: This is
another question where blanket statements such as "natural aspiration is more
reliable than forced induction" are made. No one can make a generalized
statement like this with out considering the factors of the specific
application.
Well designed forced induction systems can be reliable even on vehicles not
supercharged or turbocharged from the factory. In general, it has been our
experience that forced induction has gained a bad reputation in the aftermarket
community because either the system was not designed properly or the system
places so much fatigue on the rest of the vehicle's components not designed for
this amount of power.
Both causes for poor reliability will affect both natural and forced induction
applications. The fact is a very small fraction of modified vehicles of
any type producing significantly more power than factory are naturally
aspirated. Based on numbers alone, more occurrences of problems with forced
induction applications are bound to be discussed.
High output forced induction engines can also be built to be reliable. However,
when a high output naturally aspirated engine is built there are three opposing
factors. Performance, Reliability, and Cost. Two of the factors always oppose
the one remaining. We try to build engines that are balanced somewhere between
these three opposing elements. Customers must understand that the increased
performance comes at a cost due to the complex materials and techniques used and
will not yield the factory priority of reliability. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Can ScienceofSpeed stroked engines be used
with super/turbochargers? |
|
A: Absolutely.
In forced induction applications, we use a completely different piston design
that produces a lower compression ratio and utilizes a larger wrist pin than the
naturally aspirated application. This
requires us to use a billet connecting rod that
results in a maximum stroke of 86mm. We can vary the bore of the engine however
our most common size is 93mm to yield a total displacement of 3.5L. |
|
|